{"id":3305,"date":"2018-11-05T17:20:03","date_gmt":"2018-11-05T16:20:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.igito.it\/?p=3305"},"modified":"2023-04-11T22:19:19","modified_gmt":"2023-04-11T21:19:19","slug":"riccardo-perona-yezid-carrillo-de-la-rosa-joe-caballero-rule-of-reason-ensayos-teoricos-sobre-racionalidad-y-razonabilidad-en-el-derecho-publico","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.igito.it\/es\/2018\/11\/05\/riccardo-perona-yezid-carrillo-de-la-rosa-joe-caballero-rule-of-reason-ensayos-teoricos-sobre-racionalidad-y-razonabilidad-en-el-derecho-publico\/","title":{"rendered":"Riccardo Perona, Yezid Carrillo de la Rosa, Joe Caballero, \u201c’Rule of Reason’: Ensayos Te\u00f3ricos sobre Racionalidad y Razonabilidad en el Derecho P\u00fablico\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"
\n\"Get<\/a><\/p>\n

Datos editoriales <\/h3>\n

Riccardo Perona, Yezid Carrillo de la Rosa, Joe Caballero, \u201c’Rule of Reason’: Ensayos Te\u00f3ricos sobre Racionalidad y Razonabilidad en el Derecho P\u00fablico\u201d. 236 pp.
\nISBN | 9788827853122
\nPrima edizione digitale: 2018
\n\u00a9 Tutti i diritti riservati.<\/p>\n

Abstract<\/h3>\n

Investigating the principle of reasonableness in the legal world requires\u2014if the task is to be taken seriously\u2014to take a journey directly to the roots of the concept of law and to the ultimate paradigms that inform its knowledge, just to find the beginning of a different and maybe harder path, heading to the idea of reason. The essays presented in this book do not aim to complete such journeys, but just to take some modest steps into them. Many con-cepts are thereby found, many more are left to be investigated. Meanwhile, between rationality and reasonableness, theory and practice, science and prudence, episteme and phronesis, a global need emerges: that to keep addressing the core of the \u2018Rule of Reason\u2019 in the law.<\/p>\n

\u00cdndice <\/h3>\n

I. Presentation – Presentaci\u00f3n
\nII. Aproximaci\u00f3n al concepto de razonabilidad (Reasonableness)
\n1. Introducci\u00f3n
\n2. Raz\u00f3n y Racionalidad
\n3. Raz\u00f3n en la ciencia
\n4. Racionalidad
\n5. Clases de Raz\u00f3n o de Racionalidad.
\n6. Un posible concepto de Razonabilidad
\n7. Referencias Bibliogr\u00e1ficas
\nIII. Racionalidad y razonabilidad en la justificaci\u00f3n de las decisiones judiciales
\n1. Introducci\u00f3n
\n2. Lugar y l\u00edmites de la raz\u00f3n anal\u00edtica en el derecho
\n3. El lugar de la t\u00f3pica en el derecho.
\n4. El puesto de la dial\u00e9ctica y la ret\u00f3rica en el derecho
\n5. T\u00e9cnicas argumentativas y clases de argumentos
\n6. El puesto de la raz\u00f3n pr\u00e1ctica en el 10 derecho
\n7. Reglas, formas y l\u00edmites del discurso pr\u00e1ctico general.
\n8. Reglas, formas, l\u00edmites de la argumentaci\u00f3n jur\u00eddica
\n9. Raz\u00f3n, lenguaje y argumentaci\u00f3n
\n10. Referencias bibliogr\u00e1ficas
\nIV. \u2018Equality, Proportionality and the \u2018Rule of Reason\u2019
\n1. Introduction: Equality, Proportionality and the Normative Order
\n2. The Meaning of Equality in Germany and Italy: The Constitutional Provisions (Art. 3 GG
\nand Art. 3 Cost.)
\n3. Treating Equally what is Equal and Differently what is Different (I): The German Case Law
\non Art. 3 GG
\n4. Treating Equally what is Equal and Differently what is Different (II): the Italian Case Law on
\nArt. 3 Cost. and the Reasonable Equality
\n5. The Meaning of Proportionality in Germany: Suitability, Necessity 11 and Principles
\nBalancing
\n6. The Meaning of Proportionality in Italy: Intrinsic Reasonableness and Interests Balancing
\n7. Summarizing the Meaning of Equality and Proportionality. Their Overlapping
\n8. The Concept of Norm and Its Ratio
\n9. The Distinction Between Rules and Principles
\n10. Rules, Principles and the Inspiring Ratio. The Order of Rules a(rou)nd Principles
\n11. Order as Non-Contradiction between \u2018Rationes\u2019: The Punctual Contradiction between
\nRules and the Unequal Treatment of Equal Situations.
\n12. Relations between the Need of Non-Contradiction and the Constitutional Canon of
\nEquality
\n13. Order as Ponderation: Prohibition of Excess and Insufficiency in Light of a Global
\nBalancing
\n14. Relations between the Need of Ponderation and the Constitutional Canon of 12
\nProportionality
\n15. Conclusions: A General Graduated Canon of Reason\u2019s Order
\n16. Bibliographical References<\/p>\n

 <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"aside","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[41,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3305","post","type-post","status-publish","format-aside","hentry","category-publications","category-latest","post_format-post-format-aside"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.igito.it\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3305","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.igito.it\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.igito.it\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.igito.it\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.igito.it\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3305"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.igito.it\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3305\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3310,"href":"https:\/\/www.igito.it\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3305\/revisions\/3310"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.igito.it\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3305"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.igito.it\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3305"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.igito.it\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3305"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}